Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Dr. Padmabhushan Megastar Chiranjeevi: This is probably the longest link for any living/dead/legended celluloid star on Wikipedia. And the link takes you to a man, whose life's graphs always shot well beyond their coordinates.

All film stars are larger than life. But this is someone monolithic. His name, fame, his films, family, his business, charity, his presence, his labels – all so towering that no ordinary mortal can even look up at him without being blinded, leave alone summon the strength to sling mud at him.

And when a mere mortal actually tries to recall the star is human too, the retribution is swift, irrational, disproportionate and merciless. Few withstood the tsunami of fury that bubbled upwards from the ocean of humblest of fans to the leaders of the associations, themselves important members of civil society in that capacity.

Let me stick to the strange experiences widely known. A journalist who dared to say a certain mega movie was average had his car burnt down by incensed fans. Another who gave a three star rating was almost killed on Film Nagar road in Jubilee Hills in Hyderabad, involving a lorry and a wonderfully freakish accident, staged in perfect filmi manner. Call it sheer coincidence. And another journalist who committed the blasphemy of saying that it is time this talented actor considered meatier roles and made a special place for himself in the annals of Telugu cinema, is threatened with grave (pun intended) consequences and is asked to 'publicly apologise' since her review in the largest circulated Hyderabad daily does not - for the zillionth time in the history of cinema writing - say the mega star dances well.

When Chiranjeevi’s film is released, it is with a record number of prints, to record collections. When he makes a public appearance, it is mass frenzy. Every award he wins is followed by a million other eulogies, wishing for the sun, moon and everything in between. So much so, another demi god of the Indian screen, Amitabh Bachchan, himself went so far as to say nothing less can be a worthier tribute than the Bharat Ratna for this actor. And when he seeks support, it is Kishkindha resurrected in support of their Lord.

The man himself, once one manages to access him breaking through the purportedly protective layers of fans and well-wishers, is a man worth knowing. Ever courteous, humble and remarkably balanced, Chiranjeevi demonstrates how exactly he has succeeded in winning hearts on and off the screen. And why his one plea can make his otherwise belligerent fans go all charitable, donating eyes and blood to the now-massive Chiranjeevi Blood bank with a visible sense of pride.

And today, as his young, stoic daughter faces a battery of cameras, displaying an almost scary clarity of thought, even those who have been at the receiving end of the wrath of his fans, remember him with a pang of sympathy.

Like always, this is big too. It is big rejection from a chit of a girl, who took three of our largest institutions – media, police and courts - along with her, in her stride against a celebrity father, who never seemed anything but benevolent. And that she should hold the hand of a faceless young man in her defiant voyage. The news is big, the father's reaction shell-shocked, the family's response befuddled. And, for once, his fans are speechless. They just do not know what to say, which side to take in this clash of the Titan and his toddler.

A journalist would understand the media's avid interest in the entire bizarre episode. The tone is of suppressed delight, the frame enlarged to fit in the blown up dimensions of a small flutter. The clamour of statements, interviews and investigations much louder in face of dignified silence from the wounded parent.

It is the first-ever opportunity for the media to peep into a life that has never dipped once it touched the skies of stardom; into the insides of a persona who never let anything but humility appear on his handsome face. It is a chink in armour carefully built around a man who was positioned beyond even reasonable critique. It is a chance to throw pebbles at someone who has, for many years, been a colossus, not a mere human. And, this probably, is the only chance they would ever get.

Stardom disproportionate to human scale spawns anomalous public responses. Glorification of a pedigree generates obnoxious curiosity about roots. And a mega star's personal life and trauma become comic book stuff, dinner-time conversation and luscious dissection pieces for lustful media.

It is another day. Another scandal. The drooling public turns to a new piece of bone. And the story of the young couple is forgotten. But, while it lasted, at least some people must surely have given this saga a dramatic title - Poetic Justice!

24 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dr. Padmabhushan who?

Sleep-Walker said...

precisely!

Anonymous said...

Duh! That was as in I don't know who is Dr. Padmabhushan, nor his daughter, not that I've turned to a "new piece of bone".

Sleep-Walker said...

Again, precisely!

The new piece of bone was for viewers who viewed. For the rest, who did not view, and those who did view but dint care - it is 'Dr Padmabhushan who?'.
I, for my sins, fall into some other category.

Anonymous said...

Precisely what?

Sleep-Walker said...

Ok. Now, I need to withdraw my piece. I was taught that any writing that needs explanatory notes is a piece of trash. And here I am, explaining my comments. The story doesn't make sense, does it? Only saving grace is it made sense to those who suffered the treatment mentioned therein. And to HT editor.
Thanks for taking the trouble. It has symbolic significance for me. : )

Anonymous said...

Chiru is the greatest, the best. Sleep-Walker, you should not jeer at him and his family and his personal problems.
And, Anonymous, shame on you that you have not heard of him.
Anyway, Sleep-Walker, it is best that you have decided to withdraw this piece. That was sensible.

Sleep-Walker said...

: )

Anonymous said...

I thought I had meandered into a page-3 piece or a sleazy news channel. As if we were not stuffed with this story ad nauseum already. And why invoke the HT Editor. Or dropping names lends (psuedo)respectability?

Sleep-Walker said...

agreed @ ad nauseum

agreed @ sleaze

agreed @ stuffed

Page 3? I thought I was jeering @ Page 3

HT editor because the piece was first publlished in HT newspaper, three weeks ago?
before it was put on the blog for a specific purpose.

And I rather think the point was missed. Thank you for the feedback anyway.

Sleep-Walker said...

dear anon,

U must be in delhi. right? :)

Anonymous said...

Precisely my point@HT editor@dropping names. I rather think the point's been missed.
Only Delhites (can) critique?

Sleep-Walker said...

never mind : )

thanks

Anonymous said...

The wise have suggested that you never mess with the media. You suck up to them. Always. There's no other go.

While I can't comment on the authenticity of the claim, if Chiru has indeed inflicted damage on journalists for simply rubbishing his movies, then he deserves to get some stick back. Pity it's the daughter that suffers in the process, but I can't blame the press for using this saga to get even.

At the risk of repeating myself, the pen is mightier than the sword.

Sleep-Walker said...

S,

It was a first-hand experience for me. guess it's my vengeance too.

Anonymous said...

Did the HT piece carry your name?

Sleep-Walker said...

Why? To assess my 'pseudo respectability?'. Yes, it did.

Anonymous said...

No, just to check if you did the death-defying act.

Sleep-Walker said...

hmmm. How do you propose to do that? Just curious!

My sixth sense tells me I did defy. Since I am living to tell the tale.

Sleep-Walker said...

wonder why karan thapar's face is beginning to flash before my eyes :(
Time seems to be fast approaching when we exchange phone numbers to let the strategic dialogue go on perpetually.
Sigh! HT does not have an edition in this land. Or does it? But the paper in its original form is sold here. Or isn't it?

Sleep-Walker said...

Bingo! Now, all the pieces are in place. You are soooo right. :)

Sleep-Walker said...

because opinions can be about my writing, not about me and my credentials? because critique stopped and ridicule started?
For me, not words, but intentions are the yardstick to measure comments. And, after all, this patch of blogland is mine. :)
And, this reply, because there is no other way to say it.

Sleep-Walker said...

Torquemada indeed. You want to extract 'moral truths'? No arena better than Delhi for that. No?

Anonymous said...

Surprised to see there hasn't been a Part-II follow-up on this, in view of the recent alleged attack on Doc Rajashekhar.